![]() process creations etc.ĭynamic detection is more complex and looks at behavioural detection e.g suspicious process relationships, along with utilising userland API hooking to examine API calls to determine if they reach a threshold of what would be considered malicious. Static detection’s can also be triggered based on the malware’s execution e.g reacting to certain malware activity. along with whether the binary is well known or signed etc. Simply put static analysis is where AV determines if you file is on a known blacklist of known bad software e.g hashes, or whether it can detect any suspicious strings in the binary which it knows to be bad. Normally AV detection it categorised in 2 ways We first need to understand how most AVs detect threats, this will allow us to try and bypass their detection methodology. Note that this is not the best OPPSEC as i’m just going to be running an arbitrary executable on disk, for a more realistic attack scenario e.g using a malicious document see my other post regarding Covenant. This post is going to use the SLIVER C2 framework to configure a stager and bypass a current updated windows defender, using shellcode injection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |